Peugeot 3008 vs Dacia Bigster – Suorituskyky, toimintamatka ja kulutus vertailussa

The automotive market is constantly evolving, with manufacturers striving to provide vehicles that reflect both modern technology and consumer preferences. Two contenders in the SUV segment that have garnered attention are the Peugeot 3008 and the Dacia Bigster. This article aims to compare these two models based on various technical aspects and innovations, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.

Design and Dimensions

Starting with design, the Peugeot 3008 boasts a strikingly modern aesthetic with a captivating front fascia and sleek lines that enhance its aerodynamic profile. Measuring 4542 mm in length, 1895 mm in width, and standing at 1641 mm high, the 3008 offers a commanding presence on the road.

In contrast, the Dacia Bigster presents a rugged yet stylish look, appealing to those seeking a more practical SUV. Slightly longer at 4570 mm, and wider at 1813 mm, the Bigster stands taller at 1705 mm, giving it a more robust stance. Both vehicles feature five doors and provide ample space for five occupants.

Performance and Engine Options

When it comes to performance, the Peugeot 3008 presents a range of engine options, including petrol mild hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and full electric variants. The power output varies from 136 HP to a robust 231 HP, catering to various driving styles. The most powerful version can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8.4 seconds. Moreover, it boasts impressive fuel consumption figures, achieving as low as 5.7 L/100 km.

The Dacia Bigster, on the other hand, offers a more modest performance profile with power outputs ranging from 130 HP to 155 HP. While it lacks the higher-performance options of the 3008, it remains competitive with a respectable 0-100 km/h acceleration time of about 9.7 seconds. With an even better fuel consumption of as low as 4.7 L/100 km, the Bigster leans into efficiency, making it an attractive choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Technology and Innovations

In terms of technology, the Peugeot 3008 shines with its advanced infotainment system, featuring a large touchscreen interface, smartphone connectivity, and a suite of driver-assistance technologies. The car includes features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and an impressive digital cockpit that enhances the driving experience.

Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster, building on its reputation for affordability, includes a functional infotainment system, although it may not match the sophistication of the 3008's offerings. Nevertheless, the Bigster incorporates essential connectivity features and sufficient driver-assistance systems, making it a competent entrant in the market.

Interior and Comfort

The interior of the Peugeot 3008 is renowned for its high-quality materials and ergonomic design, providing a comfortable and upscale environment for passengers. With a trunk capacity of 520 liters, it offers ample storage space, making it ideal for family outings or road trips.

Dacia Bigster impresses with its spacious interior, offering a trunk capacity of up to 667 liters. While the materials may not exude luxury as found in the 3008, the layout is practical and user-friendly, appealing to families looking for functionality over flair.

Price and Value

Pricing can heavily influence a purchase decision, and the Dacia Bigster typically offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Peugeot 3008. While the 3008 includes a host of refinement and performance features, it also comes with a higher price tag, reflecting its position in the market as a premium SUV.

On the contrary, the Bigster focuses on providing value for money, making it a formidable option for those seeking a reliable and spacious SUV without breaking the bank.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the Peugeot 3008 and Dacia Bigster cater to distinct segments of the market. The 3008, with its performance, modern design, and advanced technology, is ideal for buyers seeking luxury and innovation. Conversely, the Bigster champions practicality, efficiency, and value, appealing to those who prioritize function and affordability. Ultimately, the choice between these two SUVs will depend on individual preferences and requirements in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.