Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-30 – Kumpi auto sopii sinulle paremmin?

Ford Puma vs. Mazda CX-30: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out as impressive contenders. Both vehicles offer unique features, innovative technology, and refined driving experiences. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical specifications, performance metrics, and innovations that set these two models apart.

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The Ford Puma offers a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and an electric variant. The power outputs range from 125 to 168 HP, with impressive torque figures of up to 290 Nm. This translates to acceleration times as quick as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, showcasing it as a spirited performer in its class. Furthermore, the Puma boasts fuel consumption figures between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, making it a fuel-efficient option for daily drivers.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a petrol MHEV engine that provides up to 186 HP and 240 Nm of torque. While it may not have the same power range as the Puma, it still offers respectable acceleration times, peaking at 8.3 seconds. Fuel consumption for the CX-30 hovers around 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it as a competitive alternative in terms of efficiency.

Transmission and Driving Dynamics

Both vehicles come equipped with manual and automatic transmission options. The Ford Puma is particularly notable for its advanced Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission, which enhances responsiveness and improves driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the CX-30 offers a traditional Automatic Gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, with the added option of All-Wheel Drive for enhanced traction on challenging terrains.

In terms of drive configurations, the Puma is limited to Front-Wheel Drive, while the CX-30 provides the flexibility of both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, appealing to a wider audience who may seek off-road capability.

Dimension and Comfort

When comparing dimensions, the Ford Puma measures at lengths between 4186 and 4226 mm, while the Mazda CX-30 is slightly longer at 4395 mm. The wider stance of the Puma, at 1805 mm compared to the CX-30’s 1795 mm, may offer a more stable driving experience. Both vehicles come with spacious interiors and can seat up to five passengers comfortably.

In terms of trunk capacity, the Ford Puma leads with options ranging from 456 to 523 liters, allowing for practical storage solutions. The CX-30, although slightly lower with 422 to 430 liters, still provides adequate space for everyday needs.

Interior Technology and Innovations

One of the standout features of the Ford Puma is its incorporation of advanced technology, including the latest Ford SYNC infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones. It offers various driver-assist technologies designed to enhance safety and comfort.

The Mazda CX-30 does not fall short in the tech department either, featuring the Mazda Connect system which provides a user-friendly interface coupled with premium sound systems. Additionally, its interior design emphasizes quality materials and a driver-focused layout, ensuring a luxurious feel.

Conclusion: Choices for the Modern Driver

Both the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 excel in different areas, catering to diverse preferences among compact SUV buyers. The Puma offers a more extensive power range, better fuel efficiency, and versatile interior space. On the other hand, the CX-30 provides a balance of performance, AWD capability, and upscale interior features.

Ultimately, your choice will come down to specific driving needs and personal preferences. Each model brings its own strengths to the table, ensuring that whether you are looking for practicality in the Ford Puma or the refined luxury of the Mazda CX-30, both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment.