Subaru Crosstrek vs Suzuki S-Cross – Kumpi malli toimii paremmin arjessa?

The Compact Adventure: Subaru Crosstrek vs Suzuki S-Cross

When it comes to selecting an SUV that's both practical and ready for adventure, two contenders that come to mind are the Subaru Crosstrek and the Suzuki S-Cross. Both vehicles offer unique facets catering to modern drivers. Let’s dive into their technical prowess and innovations to determine which might suit your needs best.

Powertrain and Performance

The Subaru Crosstrek features a petrol MHEV engine paired with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) which provides smooth acceleration and improved fuel efficiency. Its 136 HP and a torque of 182 Nm enable it to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 10.8 seconds. With an all-wheel-drive system, the Crosstrek is tailored for versatility in driving conditions, pushing a top speed of 198 km/h.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross offers more engine options, including a full hybrid and petrol MHEV, with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP. The S-Cross impresses with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 9.5 seconds, demonstrating an edge in city-driving agility. Consumers have the flexibility of choosing between automatic and manual transmissions, and while all-wheel drive is available, the front-wheel drive option enhances fuel efficiency.

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of eco-efficiency, the Suzuki S-Cross takes the lead by offering a range of 5.1 to 5.7 L/100km in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions between 116 and 131 g/km. It garners a CO2 efficiency class of D.

Conversely, the Subaru Crosstrek consumes about 7.7 L/100km and has higher CO2 emissions at 174 g/km, placing it in the F efficiency class. While not as eco-friendly as its rival, the Crosstrek compensates with its robust all-terrain capabilities.

Dimensions and Practicality

The Crosstrek is marginally larger, measuring 4495 mm in length, offering a substantial curb appeal. Its trunk space is 315 L, which is adequate for weekend getaways. However, its curb weight ranges from 1595 to 1628 kg, which is on the heavier side for its class.

The Suzuki S-Cross, with a length of 4300 mm, is more compact yet doesn’t shy away in practicality. Its trunk capacity extends to 430 L, providing extra room for cargo. It is notably lighter with weights between 1280 and 1435 kg, enhancing its fuel economy and driving agility.

The Final Verdict

The choice between the Subaru Crosstrek and the Suzuki S-Cross essentially boils down to priorities. The Crosstrek is ideal for those who prioritize rugged capability and all-wheel drive traction. Meanwhile, the S-Cross presents itself as a fuel-efficient urban runabout that doesn't compromise on performance or practicality.

Ultimately, both vehicles bring a commendable set of features in the compact SUV segment, catering to varied driving preferences and lifestyles. Whether it’s adventure or efficiency you seek, these models have the offerings to meet your needs.