Mazda CX-30 vs VW T-Roc - Erot ja hinnat vertailussa

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 yhdistää tyylikkään ulkonäön ja huipputeknologian, mikä tekee siitä erinomaisen valinnan kaupunkiajoon ja pidemmille matkoille. Sen tilava sisustus ja korkealaatuiset materiaalit tarjoavat mukavuutta ja käytännöllisyyttä kaikille matkustajille. Suzukilla on taito kehittää autoja, jotka ovat sekä nautinnollisia ajaa että ympäristöystävällisiä.

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

VW T-Roc

Volkswagen T-Roc on moderni ja tyylikäs kompaktik SUV, joka yhdistää mukavuuden ja käytännöllisyyden. Sen rohkea muotoilu ja monipuoliset sisätilat tekevät siitä erinomaisen valinnan sekä kaupunkiajoon että pidemmille matkoille. T-Roc tarjoaa myös laajan valikoiman älykkäitä varusteita, jotka parantavat ajokokemusta ja turvallisuutta.

@ Volkswagen

@ Volkswagen

@ Volkswagen

@ Volkswagen

Elegant Compact Crossovers: Mazda CX-30 vs. VW T-Roc

The compact SUV market has exploded in recent years, offering customers an attractive combination of style, performance, and utility. In this segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen T-Roc stand out as two prominent contenders. Both vehicles deliver a compelling package; however, they come with their distinct personalities and technical specifications.

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a robust petrol MHEV engine. Available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, it offers a choice between Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, producing either 186 HP or 140 HP. This SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds, topped off with a maximum speed between 191 and 204 km/h. Its efficient design allows for a consumption rate between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100km, depending on the configuration.

In contrast, the Volkswagen T-Roc offers diversity with both petrol and diesel engine types. With power options ranging from 115 HP up to a sporty 300 HP, the T-Roc can suit a variety of driving styles. The 0 to 100 km/h acceleration varies from a moderate 12.3 seconds in the lower models to a zippy 4.9 seconds in the top-performance variant. Like the CX-30, it offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, consuming between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100km.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30, measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm wide, and standing 1540 mm high, provides a sleek and assertive presence on the road. It embraces Mazda’s signature design language with a beautifully sculpted body that stands out among its peers.

Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc boasts a compact form at 4236 to 4271 mm in length, and a width of either 1819 or 1811 mm. Its height varies between 1527 and 1584 mm. The T-Roc is noted for its bold visual stance and vibrant aesthetic options that appeal to a youthful and adventurous audience.

Interior and Practicality

On the inside, the Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both cater to comfort and utility with seating for up to five passengers. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters, ideal for daily errands and short trips alike. It is designed with ergonomic excellence and refined material quality, aimed at creating an upscale ambiance.

The T-Roc, however, edges ahead with a slightly broader trunk capacity of 392 to 445 liters in the five-door versions, providing a practical edge for those valuing space efficiency. Its interior is characterized by practicality and intuitive technology that ensure a connected journey.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both models deliver strong performances in terms of environmental impact. The Mazda CX-30 has a CO2 efficiency class ranging from D to E, with CO2 emissions spanning from 129 to 148 g/km. The T-Roc, on the other hand, spans a wider range from D to G class, with emissions tracking between 125 and 194 g/km, offering more variability within its engine choices.

Conclusion

The Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both represent compelling choices in the compact SUV category, each aiming to capture the hearts of drivers with distinct strengths. The CX-30 is inclined towards those valuing refinement and a smooth driving experience, while the T-Roc appeals to those seeking versatility, power, and bold styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on individual preferences and requirements, along with their respective design and driving dynamics.