Toyota C-HR vs VW T-Cross – Suorituskyky, toimintamatka ja kulutus vertailussa

A Clash of Compact SUVs: Toyota C-HR vs. VW T-Cross

The world of compact SUVs is fiercely competitive, and two models stand out in this segment: the Toyota C-HR and the VW T-Cross. Both vehicles cater to those looking for a balance of style, efficiency, and functionality. Let's break down these two popular models and see how they stack up against each other.

Design and Build

The Toyota C-HR exudes a futuristic and edgy design with its angular lines and coupé-like silhouette. It measures 4,362 mm in length, 1,832 mm in width, and up to 1,564 mm in height, offering a robust presence on the road. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents a more traditional SUV appearance with compact dimensions, measuring 4,127 mm in length, 1,784 mm in width, and 1,573 mm in height.

Power and Performance

Beneath the hood, the C-HR presents a versatile powertrain lineup with its Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid options. It boasts power outputs ranging from 140 to 223 horsepower, allowing for varied performance options, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h completed in as little as 7.4 seconds. In contrast, the T-Cross keeps things simpler with its petrol engines, offering power outputs between 95 and 150 horsepower and a maximum speed of up to 200 km/h. The T-Cross reaches 100 km/h from a standstill in around 8.4 to 11.2 seconds, depending on the powertrain.

Transmission and Drivetrain

The C-HR utilizes a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) in its automatic setup and offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, catering to different driving preferences. The T-Cross provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions but only with a front-wheel-drive setup.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency is where the C-HR shines, with consumption as low as 0.8 L/100 km for its plugin hybrid variant and CO2 emissions starting from just 19 g/km. The T-Cross, being purely petrol-driven, consumes between 5.6 and 6 L/100 km, resulting in CO2 emissions from 127 g/km upward.

Interior and Practicality

Both vehicles seat five and provide ample space for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity of the C-HR varies between 350 and 447 liters, whereas the T-Cross offers a consistent 455 liters, providing an edge in cargo-carrying capability. The C-HR offers a modern interior with a focus on technology and comfort, whereas the T-Cross delivers straightforward functionality combined with quality materials.

Innovations and Features

Toyota's focus on hybrid technology is evident in the C-HR, which allows for electric-only driving for up to 68 km, depending on the version. Advanced driver-assistance systems are a standard in both models, enhancing safety and convenience for the driver.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the VW T-Cross ultimately depends on the consumer's priorities. For those prioritizing cutting-edge hybrid technology and eco-friendliness, the C-HR presents a compelling choice. On the other hand, those who prefer a straightforward, petrol-powered SUV with a focus on practicality and classic design would find the T-Cross appealing. Both models serve as excellent contenders in the compact SUV segment, each with its unique strengths.