Mitsubishi Space Star vs Toyota Aygo – Kumpi auto on parempi valinta?

In the world of compact cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo are two prominent players vying for the attention of urban drivers. Both models stand out with their unique characteristics, appealing designs, and efficient performance. In this article, we will delve into these vehicles from a technical perspective and explore their innovations, helping prospective buyers make an informed choice.

Design and Dimensions

The Mitsubishi Space Star, a hatchback, measures 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it well-suited for city driving, allowing for easy maneuvering and parking.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo, an SUV, features a slightly shorter length of 3700 mm but is wider at 1740 mm and taller at 1510 mm. This design gives the Aygo a more robust appearance and allows for a spacious interior, despite its smaller overall footprint.

Powertrains and Performance

Both vehicles are equipped with petrol engines, offering a good blend of performance and efficiency. The Mitsubishi Space Star's 1.2-liter engine produces 71 HP, delivering a torque of 102 Nm. It can be paired with a manual gearbox or a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission). With a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 14.1 seconds, it can reach a top speed of 167 km/h.

Conversely, the Toyota Aygo boasts a slightly more powerful output of 72 HP from its 1.0-liter engine, generating 93 Nm of torque. Similar transmission options are available, and it completes the 0-100 km/h sprint in 15.5 seconds, with a maximum speed of 158 km/h. Both cars come with front-wheel drive, pairing efficiency with adequate performance for everyday commutes.

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel economy is a crucial consideration for urban drivers, and both models perform admirably in this department. The Space Star offers fuel consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 5.5 L/100km, while the Aygo presents marginally better efficiency, achieving figures between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km. With both vehicles equipped with a fuel tank capacity of 35 liters, they are well-positioned for longer trips without frequent refueling.

Cargo Space and Practicality

Practicality is another essential feature for city cars. The Mitsubishi Space Star has a trunk capacity of up to 235 liters, making it suitable for grocery runs or a weekend getaway. In comparison, the Toyota Aygo offers a slightly smaller trunk space of 231 liters, which still provides adequate room for daily essentials.

Both cars are designed with a 5-door configuration, enhancing accessibility for passengers and cargo alike. However, the Space Star seats five occupants comfortably, while the Aygo can accommodate four adults, which may influence buyer preference based on space needs.

Environmental Considerations

With increasing emphasis on environmental friendliness, both the Space Star and Aygo offer low CO2 emissions. The Space Star produces between 112 to 125 g/km CO2, categorizing it in the C and D efficiency classes. In contrast, the Aygo stands out with emissions between 108 to 112 g/km, placing it firmly in the C efficiency class, which could appeal to eco-conscious drivers.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Toyota Aygo have their own strengths, catering to different driver preferences. The Space Star impresses with its power, space, and a slight edge in performance, while the Aygo offers better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. As urbanization continues to grow, both vehicles are well-equipped to serve commuters seeking an efficient and compact solution. Ultimately, the choice may boil down to personal preference and brand loyalty, making a test drive an essential next step in deciding between these two noteworthy contenders.