MG MG3 vs Renault Captur – Kumpi auto on parempi valinta?

MG3 vs Renault Captur: A Compact Battle on Four Wheels

When it comes to choosing a compact car, both the MG3 and Renault Captur offer compelling options. However, they cater to slightly different audiences and driving needs. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations of these two intriguing vehicles.

Body Style and Dimensions

The MG3 is a classic hatchback, designed for urban agility and ease of parking. It measures 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and stands at 1502 mm in height. On the other hand, the Renault Captur embraces an SUV body style, offering a higher stance with dimensions of 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height. The extra height and length of the Captur might appeal to those seeking a slightly more commanding view of the road.

Engine and Performance

The MG3 provides choice with its Full Hybrid and Petrol options, offering a power output of up to 194 HP and 116 HP respectively. With a sprightly acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds, it is paired with an automatic or manual gearbox, suitable for different driving preferences. The top speed clocks in at 170 km/h.

In contrast, the Renault Captur showcases a diverse range of engine types, including Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and LPG, with power ranging from a modest 91 HP to a robust 158 HP. It employs multiple transmission options, including a dual-clutch automatic, maintaining competitive performance with an acceleration range of 8.5 to 14.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Captur’s top speed varies slightly depending on the engine, peaking at 180 km/h.

Efficiency and Environment

Focusing on fuel economy, the hybrid MG3 shines with a consumption rate of just 4.4 L/100 km. Its petrol counterpart consumes slightly more at 6.1 L/100 km, aligning with a CO2 efficiency class of C or E, based on the configuration. It emits between 100 and 137 g/km of CO2, showcasing its eco-conscious design.

Renault Captur offers efficient choices as well, with its hybrid model consuming 4.7 L/100 km, and other engines ranging up to 7.8 L/100 km. It reflects CO2 efficiency classes of C or D, with emissions spanning from 106 to 139 g/km.

Practicality and Payload

For practicality, the MG3 offers a trunk capacity of 293 liters, while the Renault Captur provides between 326 and 422 liters, depending on the configuration, ensuring generous space for family adventures. The MG3 carries a payload capacity of 448 kg against the Captur's range of 372 to 383 kg, depending on the model.

Interior Comfort and Seating

Both models comfortably seat five passengers. The MG3's straightforward, pragmatic interior contrasts with the Captur's more elevated SUV interior experience, which may appeal to those looking for a touch of sophistication alongside practicality.

Conclusion: To Each Their Own

In the MG3, we find a compact, efficiently performing hatchback, ideal for city dwellers and those who prize maneuverability and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur targets individuals desiring the elevated view and spaciousness of an SUV, combined with versatile engine options.

Ultimately, the perfect choice depends on personal priorities: whether it's the sporty, economic drive of the MG3 or the versatile, elevated comfort of the Renault Captur, each vehicle has its own unique strengths in the compact car segment.