Mazda CX-80 vs VW Tayron – Suorituskyky, toimintamatka ja kulutus vertailussa

As the automotive market evolves, consumers often find themselves faced with the dilemma of choosing between two compelling models. In this comparison, we delve into the features, performance, and innovations of the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, two SUVs that aim to cater to modern drivers' needs while providing distinct advantages. Let's explore the details.

Powertrain Performance

The Mazda CX-80 comes equipped with a range of powerful engine options, including a robust 327 HP plug-in hybrid and a respectable 254 HP diesel mild-hybrid. These engines are paired with an automatic gearbox and all-wheel drive, delivering commendable performance with an acceleration range of 6.8 to 8.4 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. With a torque output that reaches up to 550 Nm, the CX-80 promises engaging driving dynamics.

In contrast, the VW Tayron offers a diverse engine lineup that features petrol mild-hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and diesel options. The Tayron's power output varies substantially, with a maximum of 272 HP available from its high-performance engine. The Tayron also boasts competitive acceleration times ranging from 7.3 to 9.4 seconds, depending on the engine variant selected. With torque figures reaching 400 Nm, the Tayron positions itself as a capable contender in performance.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for many buyers today. The Mazda CX-80 leads with impressive consumption figures of just 1.6 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variant, while the diesel option still achieves a respectable 5.7 L/100 km. CO2 emissions start at a low 35 g/km for the plug-in hybrid, making it an eco-friendly choice for consumers keen on reducing their carbon footprint.

On the other side, the VW Tayron demonstrates a varied performance in this aspect, with figures ranging between 0.4 L/100 km for the hybrid variant and 6.2 L/100 km for petrol engines. Its emissions vary as well, with some models emitting as low as 9 g/km, illustrating the efficiency potential of its electrified powertrains.

Interior Space and Comfort

While the Mazda CX-80 accommodates up to seven passengers, the VW Tayron seats five, which may cater to different audience needs. The CX-80 features a trunk capacity of 258 liters, which may feel limiting compared to the Tayron’s ample luggage space of 705 to 885 liters, depending on the configuration. For families or those needing extra storage, the Tayron's versatile interior may offer a more practical solution.

Dimensions and Design

In terms of dimensions, the Mazda CX-80 measures 4995 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1714 mm in height. This larger stature translates into a commanding road presence, which many drivers appreciate. The design quality reflects Mazda's commitment to a premium feel through thoughtful craftsmanship.

The VW Tayron is a more compact option at 4792 mm long, with a width of 1853 to 1866 mm and a height of 1666 to 1668 mm. While smaller, its elegant, dynamic design language captures the modern essence that VW is known for, making it visually appealing for urban drivers.

Innovations and Technology

Both SUVs come packed with technological advancements that enhance driving experiences. The Mazda CX-80 features innovative safety systems and advanced infotainment capabilities, ensuring that passengers stay connected while on the road.

Meanwhile, the VW Tayron enhances driver assistance with a cutting-edge suite of tech features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive digital cockpit, which allows drivers to customize their displays for a more personalized driving interface.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Mazda CX-80 and VW Tayron ultimately hinges on buyer preferences. The CX-80 shines with its spacious seven-seater layout, robust hybrid options, and eco-friendly attributes. In contrast, the Tayron captivates with a streamlined design, innovative features, and impressive cargo capacity. Both vehicles offer technological advancements and performance capabilities, but your choice will depend on specific needs and lifestyle. Each SUV represents a unique balance of performance and practicality, making them worthy contenders in a highly competitive segment.