Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Qashqai - Erot ja hinnat vertailussa

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 yhdistää tyylikkään ulkonäön ja huipputeknologian, mikä tekee siitä erinomaisen valinnan kaupunkiajoon ja pidemmille matkoille. Sen tilava sisustus ja korkealaatuiset materiaalit tarjoavat mukavuutta ja käytännöllisyyttä kaikille matkustajille. Suzukilla on taito kehittää autoja, jotka ovat sekä nautinnollisia ajaa että ympäristöystävällisiä.

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

Nissan Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai on pitkään ollut suosittu valinta urbaanien autoilijoiden keskuudessa sen tyylikkään muotoilun ja käytännöllisyyden ansiosta. Tämä kompakti SUV tarjoaa erinomaisen ajomukavuuden ja monipuoliset tilat, jotka tekevät siitä täydellisen kumppanin niin arkeen kuin viikonloppu-retkille. Uusimmat varusteet ja turvallisuusominaisuudet tekevät Qashqai'sta entistä houkuttelevamman vaihtoehdon autoa etsiville.

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Mazda CX-30 vs. Nissan Qashqai

In the ever-growing segment of compact SUVs, two names often stand out: the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Qashqai. Both vying for the same space in our driveways, these vehicles offer distinct features and innovations that cater to the modern driver. This article delves into their technicalities, to help you make an informed decision on which SUV might better fit your lifestyle.

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-30 offers a choice between a petrol mild hybrid system paired with either a manual or automatic gearbox. With power options of 186 HP and 140 HP, the CX-30 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a time range of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds, reaching a maximum speed between 191 and 204 km/h. The engine capacity varies from 1998 to 2488 cm³, providing torque of up to 240 Nm.

Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai offers both petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid options. Engine power varies from 140 HP up to 190 HP. The Qashqai’s acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 7.9 to 10.2 seconds, with a top speed between 170 and 206 km/h. Engine capacity here ranges from 1332 to 1497 cm³, boasting torque figures up to 330 Nm.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Mazda has equipped the CX-30 with a fuel consumption rate ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, accompanied by a CO2 efficiency class categorized as D and E. The emissions range from 129 to 148 g/km, balancing performance with efficiency.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai shows a consumption range between 5.1 to 6.8 L/100 km and emissions ranging from 116 to 154 g/km, with efficiency classes also in the D and E brackets.

Space and Dimensions

With a length of 4395 mm, width of 1795 mm, and height of 1540 mm, the CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters. Its curb weight oscillates from 1455 to 1587 kg.

The Nissan Qashqai offers slightly bigger dimensions: 4425 mm length, 1835 mm width, and a height of 1625 mm. Its trunk offers 479 to 504 liters of space, and it weighs between 1420 to 1665 kg depending on the model.

Innovations and Features

The Mazda CX-30 incorporates sleek design philosophies and cutting-edge technology, ensuring that the driver remains engaged with its intuitive interior layout. The offerings in power variations cater to different driving preferences, whether it's a demanding daily routine or weekend getaways.

Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai presents innovation in the form of its hybrid technology and a range of transmission options including a CVT and reduction gearbox. The extended trunk space and efficient fuel consumption make it an attractive option for families and long-distance travelers.

Conclusion

The choice between the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai ultimately hinges on personal priorities. If a sportier drive and slightly more compact design intrigue you, the CX-30 might be the perfect companion for your journeys. Meanwhile, the Qashqai offers superior efficiency and space, especially appealing to those with a focus on utility without compromising on innovation.

Both cars continue to lead the compact SUV market with their respective strengths, proving once again that technological advancements and practical design can coexist beautifully in the automotive world.