Citroen C3 vs VW Polo – Suorituskyky, toimintamatka ja kulutus vertailussa

Citroen C3 vs. VW Polo: A Clash of Compact Titans

In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Citroen C3 and the VW Polo stand out as two formidable contenders. Each offers unique attributes tailored to different driving preferences and lifestyle needs. Let's delve into what sets these models apart and how they stack up against each other in 2024.

Design and Dimensions

The Citroen C3 boasts an SUV body type, delivering a robust and commanding presence on the road with its dimensions measuring 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height. This spacious configuration is perfect for those who prioritize interior space.

On the other hand, the VW Polo, a classic hatchback, embodies a sleek and agile design, slightly longer at 4074 mm, while slightly narrower and lower, at 1751 mm in width and 1431 mm in height, respectively. This design caters to those who seek a nimble and efficient city cruiser.

Engine and Performance

Citroen C3 offers a versatile engine lineup including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV options, paired with either manual or automatic transmission. It shines in terms of power, with options delivering up to 113 HP and a torque of 205 Nm, ensuring zippy performance with a top speed of 183 km/h. Its fuel efficiency is noteworthy, at 5.6L/100km for petrol engines and an impressive electric range of 320 to 326 km.

The VW Polo opts for petrol engines with a power spectrum ranging from 80 HP to an exhilarating 207 HP offered by its higher-performance variants, supported by torque peaking at 320 Nm. The Polo maintains solid fuel efficiency, consuming between 5.2 to 6.5 L/100km, complemented by a quick acceleration time, going from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6.5 seconds for the top models.

Transmission and Drive

Both vehicles feature front-wheel drive systems, enhancing their usability in urban settings. The C3 offers a choice of manual, reduction, and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, allowing drivers to select based on personal preference. The Polo provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, catering to driving purists and those seeking ease of use.

Interior and Capacity

Inside, the C3 maintains a seating capacity for five, with a trunk capacity of 310 L, which might appeal to families seeking a comfortable ride. In comparison, the Polo offers slightly more trunk space at 351 L, making it suitable for individuals or small families prioritizing storage.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of CO2 emissions, the Citroen C3's petrol variants score a CO2 efficiency class of D, emitting between 123 and 126 g/km, whereas the electric variant stands proudly with zero emissions. The Polo, while efficient, falls under D and E classes, with emissions ranging from 118 to 149 g/km, largely depending on the engine size.

Conclusion

Both the Citroen C3 and the VW Polo present compelling options in the compact car segment, each with distinct advantages tailored for different needs. The C3's diverse engine choices and SUV stature make it a versatile and spacious choice for families. Meanwhile, the Polo's refined hatchback form and powerful engine variants offer an edge for those who value agility and performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two icons will hinge on individual priorities, be it space, efficiency, or driving dynamism.