SEAT Arona vs Skoda Scala – Erot ja hinnat vertailussa

The automotive landscape is continuously evolving, bringing forth a myriad of options for consumers. In this comparative review, we delve into two popular vehicles: the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Scala. Each model offers its unique features and cater to different segments. Let's explore the technical aspects and innovations that set them apart.

Body Type and Design

The SEAT Arona is classified as an SUV, emphasizing a taller stance, a higher seating position, and an overall robust architecture, which appeals to those seeking a compact yet versatile vehicle. On the other hand, the Skoda Scala is a hatchback that leans towards a sportier and more dynamic design, offering a streamlined silhouette that enhances aerodynamics and aesthetics. The choice between an SUV and a hatchback ultimately boils down to personal preference and intended use.

Performance and Engine Options

Both the SEAT Arona and Skoda Scala boast a range of petrol engine options, providing flexibility and performance suited for varied driver demands. The Arona offers three engine choices—95 HP, 115 HP, and a potent 150 HP variant—with a commendable torque range from 175 Nm to 250 Nm. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from 8.4 seconds to 11.3 seconds, depending on the engine selected.

The Scala similarly features engine configurations producing 95 HP, 115 HP, and a sportier 150 HP, with a torque range mirroring that of the Arona. It also showcases impressive acceleration figures, with certain models achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.2 seconds, positioning it as a competitor in terms of performance.

Transmission and Drive Type

Both models come equipped with a choice of manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, enabling a tailored driving experience. Each vehicle is front-wheel drive, ensuring straightforward handling dynamics and optimized traction under various conditions. The manual transmissions offer up a spirited driving experience, while the automatic options provide convenience for daily commuting.

Fuel Efficiency

Regarding fuel efficiency, the SEAT Arona achieves consumption figures between 5.4 and 5.6 L/100 km. The Skoda Scala edges slightly ahead with its models delivering between 5.1 and 5.6 L/100 km, making it a more fuel-efficient choice for those prioritizing economy.

Interior Space and Comfort

Interior space is a critical consideration for potential buyers. The Arona seats five and has a trunk capacity of 400 L, accommodating a family’s needs or weekly groceries. The Scala, being slightly larger, offers even more with a trunk capacity of 467 L, which can be particularly advantageous for avid travelers or families with a flair for outdoor activities.

Dimensions and Weight

Dimensionally, the SEAT Arona measures 4153 mm in length, 1780 mm in width, and stands 1537 mm tall. The Skoda Scala is somewhat longer at 4362 mm, slightly wider at 1793 mm, and taller at 1514 mm. The Scala’s greater length adds to its spacious interior, while the Arona's compact form aids in urban maneuverability. Curb weights are also comparable, with Arona ranging from 1213 to 1268 kg and Scala from 1199 to 1271 kg, ensuring both vehicles remain light on their feet on the road.

Innovations and Technology

Both the SEAT Arona and Skoda Scala are equipped with modern technology and innovation, enhancing the overall driving experience. The Arona sports a user-friendly infotainment system, allowing seamless connectivity with smartphones via Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. The Scala mirrors these features and adds to the technology package, including additional driver-assist technologies that bolster safety and convenience.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the SEAT Arona and Skoda Scala offer compelling choices for potential buyers in the compact vehicle segment. The Arona excels in compact SUV aesthetics and higher driving position, while the Scala impresses with hatchback style, spacious interiors, and superior fuel economy. Ultimately, the decision lies in personal preference and lifestyle needs, turning the choice of either model into a win-win scenario for consumers.