Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Qashqai - Erot ja hinnat vertailussa

Mazda CX-60

Mazda CX-60 on vaikuttava lisä Mazdan mallistoon, yhdistäen tyylikkään muotoilun ja huipputeknologian. Sen tilava sisustus ja ensiluokkainen materiaalivalikoima tarjoavat mukavuutta sekä kuljettajalle että matkustajille. CX-60:n ajodynamiikka ja ympäristöystävälliset vaihtoehdot tekevät siitä erinomaisen valinnan moderneille autoilijoille.

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

@ de.mazda-press.com

Nissan Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai on pitkään ollut suosittu valinta urbaanien autoilijoiden keskuudessa sen tyylikkään muotoilun ja käytännöllisyyden ansiosta. Tämä kompakti SUV tarjoaa erinomaisen ajomukavuuden ja monipuoliset tilat, jotka tekevät siitä täydellisen kumppanin niin arkeen kuin viikonloppu-retkille. Uusimmat varusteet ja turvallisuusominaisuudet tekevät Qashqai'sta entistä houkuttelevamman vaihtoehdon autoa etsiville.

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

@ Nissan

The rapidly evolving automotive landscape presents consumers with a plethora of choices, especially in the competitive compact SUV segment. Two standout vehicles vying for attention are the Mazda CX-60 and the Nissan Qashqai. Each brings unique features, cutting-edge technology, and performance capabilities that cater to different preferences. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two models, examining various technical aspects and innovations.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-60 showcases a bold and sporty design characterized by its dynamic, sleek lines and a muscular stance. With a length of 4745 mm, width of 1890 mm, and a height ranging from 1680 mm to 1688 mm, it offers a substantial presence on the road. The five-door layout seamlessly blends aesthetics with functionality, ensuring ample cabin space for passengers and cargo.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai, measuring 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width while standing at 1625 mm in height, presents a more compact and agile silhouette. Also featuring a five-door configuration, it is ideal for urban environments where maneuverability is key. The Qashqai’s design emphasizes modern lines and a refined front fascia, appealing to a wide demographic.

Powertrains and Performance

The Mazda CX-60 offers an array of engine options, including a powerful 327 HP plug-in hybrid system, a diesel MHEV with up to 200 HP, and a potent 254 HP gasoline variant. Coupled with advanced automatic transmissions, the CX-60 provides a seamless driving experience across varying terrains. Notably, the plug-in hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, catering to eco-conscious drivers.

In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is equipped with petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, producing power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP. With a choice of manual and automatic transmissions (CVT), the Qashqai is designed for both performance and efficiency. The acceleration figures reveal that while the Qashqai can achieve 0-100 km/h in as fast as 7.9 seconds, it traditionally lags behind the CX-60’s top-performing models.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Mazda CX-60 shines with dramatically low figures, particularly in its hybrid variant, which achieves an astounding 1.4 L/100km. The diesel variant also performs admirably, consuming around 5 L/100km. This efficiency contributes significantly to its lower emissions, with CO2 figures starting from just 31 g/km.

The Nissan Qashqai's fuel consumption ranges from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the selected engine and configuration. Its emissions range between 116 g/km and 154 g/km, indicating that while it is efficient, it does not quite match the CX-60 in this regard.

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles impress with their interiors, highlighting modern design, quality materials, and advanced technology. The CX-60 boasts a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, providing ample room for luggage and everyday items. Technological innovations include a user-friendly infotainment system and advanced driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and comfort.

Similarly, the Nissan Qashqai offers a comfortable interior with refined finishes and practicality. The trunk space measures between 479 and 504 liters, accommodating various cargo needs. The Qashqai stands out with its cutting-edge technology, offering a comprehensive suite of safety features and an intuitive infotainment system to keep drivers connected.

Driving Experience

The Mazda CX-60 is constructed with a focus on engaging driving dynamics, delivering exceptional handling thanks to its rear-wheel drive layout in some variants and advanced all-wheel drive options. It caters to enthusiasts looking for a spirited and responsive driving experience, especially with its acceleration capabilities, reaching 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.8 seconds.

Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai, while providing a composed ride, emphasizes comfort and practicality over sportiness. Its handling is surprisingly responsive for its segment, with various driving modes allowing drivers to tailor the experience based on road conditions. However, it does not exhibit the same level of athleticism as the CX-60.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-60 and Nissan Qashqai offer compelling options within the compact SUV market. The CX-60 excels in terms of performance, efficiency, and driving engagement, making it an enticing option for those seeking a robust driving experience. In contrast, the Qashqai prioritizes comfort and urban practicality, appealing to a broader audience seeking a reliable daily driver.

Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences—whether one desires a sportier drive with advanced hybrid technology or a comfortably equipped SUV tailored for everyday ease. Both models undoubtedly deliver exceptional value in their respective niches.