@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
VS

Ford Tourneo Courier vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van – Kumpi auto on parempi valinta?

Olipa kyse arjesta, perheestä tai pitkistä matkoista – tässä näkyvät erot.
Selvitä, sopiiko Ford Tourneo Courier vai Nissan Townstar Compact Van paremmin elämäntyyliisi.

Tourneo Courier @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

A Tale of Two Vans: Ford Tourneo Courier vs. Nissan Townstar Furgoneta Compacta

In the bustling world of automotive transport, the Ford Tourneo Courier and the Nissan Townstar Furgoneta Compacta represent the pinnacle of practicality and modern flair. This comparison aims to unravel the finer details and technological advancements that set these two vehicles apart. Whether you’re hauling cargo or ferrying passengers, the intricacies of each van’s offerings will be pivotal in your decision-making process. Let's delve into the technical specifications and innovative features that characterize these distinguished models.

Townstar Compact Van @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine Power and Performance

The Ford Tourneo Courier equips drivers with a choice between petrol and electric engines, delivering a power range of 125 HP from its petrol variant and 136 HP for the electric. A nimble 3-cylinder engine complements its prowess, promoting both economy and efficiency on the road. With torque figures reaching up to 290 Nm, it manages to strike a balance between driveability and stamina.

On the other hand, the Nissan Townstar Furgoneta Compacta is no slouch, offering a slightly more robust petrol engine with 130 HP and a 122 HP electric variant. The Townstar’s 4-cylinder setup promises more traditional grunt with a torque spread peaking at 245 Nm, giving it a slight edge in terms of raw turning force over its Ford counterpart.

Tourneo Courier @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Transmission and Drivetrain

Both vehicles feature front-wheel drive configurations, a commonality that ensures stability and control in compact urban settings. The Ford Tourneo Courier provides versatility with both manual and automatic gearboxes, allowing drivers to choose their preferred mode of control. Likewise, the Nissan Townstar opts for manual and reduction gearboxes, which cater well to both dynamic driving conditions and energy efficiency.

Townstar Compact Van @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Payload Capacity

Spanning a length of 4337 mm, the Tourneo Courier is a compact vessel meant for maneuverability. The model's payload capacity of up to 483 kg and a trunk of 570 L make it ideal for smaller loads. In contrast, the Townstar stretches to a greater length of up to 4910 mm. This translates into superior cargo provision with a maximum payload of 777 kg, elevating its status among commercial users seeking substantial carrying capability.

Tourneo Courier @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Electric Range and Environmental Efficiency

Electric models of both vehicles cater to the environmentally conscious driver. The Ford Tourneo Courier boasts an electric range of 296 km thanks to its 43.5 kWh battery. This, combined with a commendable CO2 efficiency class of A, highlights Ford's dedication to sustainability.

The Townstar responds with an electric driving distance of up to 301 km on a slightly larger 45 kWh battery, slightly nudging ahead in the realm of range. Furthermore, its efficiency credentials are underscored by an equivalent high CO2 efficiency class, advocating for an eco-friendlier footprint.

Townstar Compact Van @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Interior and Comfort Features

The Ford Tourneo Courier offers passenger seating for five, emphasizing comfort and versatility for family journeys or team outings. Meanwhile, the Nissan Townstar Furgoneta Compacta targets the cargo market with a seating arrangement for two, focusing on maximizing space for cargo rather than passenger volume.

Tourneo Courier @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion

The Ford Tourneo Courier vs. Nissan Townstar Furgoneta Compacta debate centers on whether one requires passenger accommodation with commendable economy or extensive cargo capacity with robust performance. The Tourneo holds an edge for versatile family transport while the Townstar is tailored towards more demanding cargo tasks. Ultimately, preferences will be dictated by your specific transport needs, weighing the detailed advantages of length, capacity, and eco credentials inherent in both models.

In this competitive landscape, both brands channel innovation and practicality, ensuring any decision made will be of value, both environmentally and functionally.

Tässä mennään yksityiskohtiin: tekniset erot tarkemmin

Kustannukset ja kulutus

Hinta ja kulutus ovat tärkeimpiä ostopäätökseen vaikuttavia tekijöitä – ja juuri täällä erot usein korostuvat.

Ford Tourneo Courier on hinnassa pienessä määrin edullisempi – sen lähtöhinta on 25500 €, kun taas Nissan Townstar Compact Van maksaa 28300 €. Ero on noin 2801 €.

Molemmat kuluttavat keskimäärin 6.60 L /100 km – ei eroa.

Sähkönkulutuksessa etu on Ford Tourneo Courier:lla: se kuluttaa 17.30 kWh /100 km ja on melkein huomaamaton energiatehokkaampi kuin Nissan Townstar Compact Van, jonka kulutus on 18.50 kWh. Ero on noin 1.20 kWh.

Toimintamatkassa Nissan Townstar Compact Van suoriutuu melkein huomaamaton paremmin: se yltää jopa 289 km:een, noin 1 km enemmän kuin Ford Tourneo Courier.

Moottori ja suorituskyky

Moottorin alta paljastuu, kumpi malli on urheilullisempi ja kiihtyy paremmin.

Moottoritehossa Ford Tourneo Courier on kevyt etulyöntiasemassa – 136 hv verrattuna 130 hv:een. Ero on noin 6 hv hv.

Huippunopeudessa Nissan Townstar Compact Van on tuskin havaittava edellä – se yltää 183 km/h:een, kun taas Ford Tourneo Courier saavuttaa 175 km/h. Ero on noin 8 km/h.

Myös vääntömomentissa näkyy ero: Ford Tourneo Courier vetää hieman voimakkaammin, 290 Nm verrattuna 245 Nm:een. Eroa on noin 45 Nm.

Tila ja käytännöllisyys

Perheauto vai arjen kumppani – kumpi tarjoaa enemmän tilaa, mukavuutta ja käytettävyyttä?

Molemmissa autoissa on tilaa 5 henkilölle.

Omapainossa Nissan Townstar Compact Van on kevyt kevyempi – 1399 kg verrattuna 1517 kg:een. Painoero on noin 118 kg.

Maksimikantavuudessa Nissan Townstar Compact Van pärjää ratkaiseva paremmin – jopa 4900 L, noin 2738 L enemmän kuin Ford Tourneo Courier.

Kantavuudessa Nissan Townstar Compact Van on ilmeinen parempi – 775 kg verrattuna 483 kg:een. Ero on noin 292 kg.

Kuka voittaa vertailun?

Nissan Townstar Compact Van osoittautuu olevan on ylivoimainen ja saa siksi tittelin DriveDuel Champion!
Tässä vertailussa Nissan Townstar Compact Van on monipuolisempi kokonaisuus.

alkaen noin 28 300 €
Townstar Compact Van @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

  • Moottorityyppi : Bensiini, Sähkö
  • Vaihteisto : Manuel, Automaatti
  • Vetotapa : Etuveto
  • Teho hv : 122 - 130 hv
  • Kulutus L/100km : 6.6 - 7 L
  • Kulutus kWh/100km : 18.5 - 20.9 kWh
  • Sähköinen toimintasäde : 263 - 289 km
Tiedot

Ford Tourneo Courier

Ford Tourneo Courier on ketterä ja käytännöllinen tila-auto, joka yllättää tilan ja muunneltavuuden määrällä vaikka kaupunkielämässä viihtyykin. Se ei tarjoa urheilullisia elämyksiä, mutta arkiseen käyttöön ja perheen tarpeisiin sopivana, mukavana ja fiksuna vaihtoehtona se osaa naurattaa myös ahtaassa parkkiluolassa.

Tiedot
2023_FORD_E-Tourneo-Courier_Active_01 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2023_FORD_E-Tourneo-Courier_Active_04 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2023_FORD_E-Tourneo-Courier_Active_05 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2023_FORD_E-Tourneo-Courier_Active_11_Interior @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
2023_FORD_E-Tourneo-Courier_Active_30_Interior @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Townstar Furgoneta Compacta on täydellinen valinta kaupunkiliikenteeseen, yhdistäen tehokkuuden ja kompaktin muotoilun. Sen kätevät mittasuhteet helpottavat ahtaassa liikenteessä navigointia ja pysäköintiä. Moderni muotoilu ja käytännölliset ominaisuudet tekevät siitä houkuttelevan vaihtoehdon niin yrityksille kuin yksityiskäyttäjille.

Tiedot
Dynamic (12) @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Loading (4) @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Interior (1) @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Suosituimmat vertailut

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …
Ford Tourneo Courier
Nissan Townstar Compact Van
Tourneo Courier @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Townstar Compact Van @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Kustannukset ja kulutus
Hinta
25500 - 40000 €
Hinta
28300 - 46500 €
Kulutus L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L
Kulutus L/100km
6.6 - 7 L
Kulutus kWh/100km
17.30 kWh
Kulutus kWh/100km
18.5 - 20.9 kWh
Sähköinen toimintasäde
288 km
Sähköinen toimintasäde
263 - 289 km
Akun kapasiteetti
43.50 kWh
Akun kapasiteetti
45 kWh
CO2
0 - 151 g/km
CO2
0 - 159 g/km
Polttoainesäiliön tilavuus
45 L
Polttoainesäiliön tilavuus
54 L

Mitat ja kori
Kori
Korkeakattoinen farmari
Kori
Pakettiauto
Istuimet
5
Istuimet
2 - 5
Ovet
5
Ovet
4 - 5
Omamassa
1517 - 1545 kg
Omamassa
1399 - 1908 kg
Tavaratila
570 L
Tavaratila
-
Pituus
4337 mm
Pituus
4488 - 4910 mm
Leveys
1800 - 1813 mm
Leveys
1860 mm
Korkeus
1817 - 1836 mm
Korkeus
1822 - 1854 mm
Maksimi tavaratila
2162 L
Maksimi tavaratila
2100 - 4900 L
Kantavuus
480 - 483 kg
Kantavuus
537 - 775 kg

Moottori ja suorituskyky
Moottorityyppi
Sähkö, Bensiini
Moottorityyppi
Bensiini, Sähkö
Vaihteisto
Automaatti, Manuel
Vaihteisto
Manuel, Automaatti
Vaihteiston tyyppi
Alennusvaihteisto, Manuaalivaihteisto, Kaksoiskytkin automaatti
Vaihteiston tyyppi
Manuaalivaihteisto, Alennusvaihteisto
Vetotapa
Etuveto
Vetotapa
Etuveto
Teho hv
125 - 136 hv
Teho hv
122 - 130 hv
Kiihtyvyys 0-100 km/h
-
Kiihtyvyys 0-100 km/h
-
Huippunopeus
175 km/h
Huippunopeus
132 - 183 km/h
Vääntömomentti
170 - 290 Nm
Vääntömomentti
240 - 245 Nm
Sylinterien lukumäärä
3
Sylinterien lukumäärä
4
Teho kW
92 - 100 kW
Teho kW
90 - 96 kW
Iskutilavuus
998 cm3
Iskutilavuus
1332 cm3

Yleiset
Mallivuosi
2024 - 2025
Mallivuosi
2022 - 2025
CO2-tehokkuusluokka
A, E
CO2-tehokkuusluokka
F, E, A
Merkki
Ford
Merkki
Nissan

Samankaltaiset vertailut

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.4
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech …
Mitä vetotapavaihtoehtoja Ford Tourneo Courier tarjoaa?

Ford Tourneo Courier on saatavilla Etuveto-vetotavalla.

Näytetyt hinnat ja tiedot ovat arvioita, jotka perustuvat Saksan listahintoihin, ja voivat vaihdella maittain. Nämä tiedot eivät ole oikeudellisesti sitovia.