Ford Puma vs Toyota Yaris – Kumpi malli toimii paremmin arjessa?

Ford Puma vs. Toyota Yaris: A Comprehensive Comparison

The compact SUV segment has been gaining significant popularity as urban dwellers seek practicality, style, and efficiency. Among the leading contenders in this category are the Ford Puma and the Toyota Yaris. Both vehicles boast unique features and advantages that cater to different types of drivers. Let’s delve into a comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical specifications, innovations, and overall performance.

Body Types and Dimensions

The Ford Puma is classified as a compact SUV, making it a versatile choice for those needing extra cargo space and higher ground clearance. The Puma measures between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and stands between 1550 and 1555 mm in height.

On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris comes as a hatchback and is more compact, with a length ranging from 3940 to 3995 mm, a width of 1745 to 1805 mm, and a height of 1455 to 1500 mm. This difference in body types reflects a divergent approach. The Puma favors a sportier drive with more utility, while the Yaris is aimed at maximizing maneuverability and urban efficiency.

Engine and Performance

Under the hood, the Ford Puma features several petrol options, including MHEV variants with power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP. The electric version boasts a notable electric range of up to 376 km and offers a maximum speed of 210 km/h. Fuel consumption is competitive, with figures noting as low as 5.4 L/100 km for petrol and 13.1 kWh/100 km for electric. The Puma can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds.

The Toyota Yaris, in contrast, offers a different powertrain with a full hybrid system producing up to 130 HP. Fuel efficiency is impressive, with consumption rates as low as 3.8 L/100 km for the hybrid version, making it ideal for city driving. The Yaris can reach a maximum speed of 230 km/h while achieving 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 9.2 seconds for the hybrid model.

Transmission and Drive Types

Ford presents the Puma with options for both manual and automatic transmissions, including an advanced dual-clutch system. It is primarily a front-wheel-drive vehicle, catering to everyday city driving with a sporty feel.

Meanwhile, the Toyota Yaris offers a versatile driving experience with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, equipped with CVT for seamless acceleration in hybrid variants. This flexibility enhances the Yaris's capability to handle diverse road conditions, especially with its all-wheel-drive offering.

Interior Features and Comfort

When it comes to cabin space, the Ford Puma excels with a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 L, making it an excellent choice for families and those needing extra luggage space. It comfortably seats five passengers, enhancing its utility.

The Toyota Yaris, while offering a smaller trunk size of 286 to 141 L, still provides adequate room for five passengers in its hatchback design. The focus here is more on compactness and efficiency, making it easier to navigate city streets.

Innovative Technologies

Innovation is evident in both models. The Ford Puma leverages Ford's latest in-car technology, including an advanced infotainment system with a user-friendly interface and smartphone integration. Additionally, it showcases Ford's commitment to sustainability with its MHEV options.

The Toyota Yaris shines with its Toyota Safety Sense technology, incorporating advanced safety features such as pre-collision systems, lane departure alerts, and adaptive cruise control. This commitment to safety makes the Yaris a great choice for safety-conscious drivers.

Conclusion: Which One is Right for You?

Both the Ford Puma and the Toyota Yaris represent excellent choices in their respective segments. The Puma stands out for those seeking a sporty, spacious SUV with hybrid and fully electric options, while the Yaris appeals to those looking for a compact, efficient, and safe hatchback. Ultimately, the choice depends on personal preferences regarding space, performance, and driving experience.