VS

Fiat Scudo vs Renault Trafic Transporter – Kumpi auto on parempi valinta?

Vertaa suorituskykyä, tavaratilaa, kulutusta ja hintaa yhdellä silmäyksellä.
Ota selvää, kumpi auto on sinulle parempi valinta – Fiat Scudo vai Renault Trafic Transporter?

The Battle of Versatility: Fiat Scudo vs Renault Trafic Transporter

The light commercial vehicle segment is pivotal for businesses seeking reliable transport solutions with a balance of efficiency, innovation, and performance. Two standout contenders in this space are the Fiat Scudo and the Renault Trafic Transporter. This comparison delves into the technical attributes, innovations, and practicalities that define these two cargo masters.

Engine Diversity and Performance

Both the Fiat Scudo and Renault Trafic Transporter offer a range of powertrains tailored to cater to different transportation needs. The Scudo impresses with both diesel and electric engine options. The diesel variants range from 100 HP to a robust 180 HP, with torque stretching up to 400 Nm, making it a versatile choice for various load requirements. On the electric front, the Fiat Scudo boasts an electric range of up to 352 km with consumption as efficient as 23.6 kWh/100km.

The Renault Trafic Transporter, too, holds its ground with diesel and electric configurations. It offers diesel engines producing up to 170 HP and a maximum torque of 380 Nm. The electric variant provides an efficient driving experience with consumption as low as 21.3 kWh/100km, capable of traveling up to 292 km on a single charge. This combination ensures that the Trafic Transporter can meet the demands of modern transportation while keeping operational costs in check.

Transmission Options and Drive Type

Versatility in transmission options is a key highlight for both models. The Scudo offers manual and automatic gearbox options, catering to traditionalists and those who favor convenience. Its front-wheel-drive configuration ensures stability and control, further enhancing its driving dynamics.

Similarly, the Trafic Transporter provides flexibility with manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, enhancing driving flexibility and efficiency. Front-wheel drive remains a staple for both vans, delivering excellent traction and handling capabilities for city drives and open roads alike.

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Both vehicles are engineered to be environmentally considerate without compromising performance. The Scudo's diesel engines clock in a consumption rate ranging from 6.5 to 7.8 L/100km, paired with CO2 emissions as low as 170 g/km in some configurations, falling into the A and G efficiency classes.

In comparison, the Trafic Transporter is enduringly efficient as well, with diesel variants consuming 6.7 to 7.8 L/100km and emissions starting at 176 g/km, ensuring compliance with emission regulations while reducing the carbon footprint.

Practical Dimensions and Capacities

Space and payload are quintessential for cargo vans, making their dimensions and carrying capacity crucial metrics. The Scudo, available in lengths from 4609 mm to a substantial 5330 mm, supports a payload up to 1805 kg, catering to a wide variety of goods transportation needs.

The Trafic Transporter extends slightly further with lengths spanning from 5080 mm to 5480 mm and a maximum payload capacity reaching 1185 kg. Its dimensions make it suitable for businesses needing larger space without sacrificing maneuverability.

Comfort and Innovations

Progressive design meets functional space in both models. The Fiat Scudo and Renault Trafic Transporter prioritize driver comfort through ergonomic seats, advanced infotainment systems, and various seating configurations to accommodate between 2 to 6 passengers, offering adaptability for mixed-utility use.

Both vehicles encapsulate a modern-day commercial van's technology expectations, featuring multimedia interfaces, connectivity options, and driver-assist systems aimed at reducing driver fatigue and enhancing safety standards on the road.

Concluding Thoughts: Which Van Wins?

The Fiat Scudo and Renault Trafic Transporter remain fierce competitors, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Scudo is ideal for those leaning heavily into electric options and lower emissions, while the Trafic Transporter provides a slightly larger load capacity and diverse configurations to suit varied business needs.

Your choice between the two can ultimately hinge on your specific requirements, be it payload capacity, range, fuel efficiency, or technological features. Regardless of the pick, both models signify excellence in a booming segment of the automotive industry.

Tässä mennään yksityiskohtiin: tekniset erot tarkemmin

Kustannukset ja kulutus

Hinta ja tehokkuus ovat usein ensimmäiset valintakriteerit auton ostossa. Tässä näkyy, kumpi malli on pitkällä aikavälillä edullisempi – tankatessa, ladatessa tai hankintahinnassa.

Fiat Scudo on hinnassa melkein huomaamaton edullisempi – sen lähtöhinta on 36100 €, kun taas Renault Trafic Transporter maksaa 38700 €. Ero on noin 2678 €.

Myös polttoaineenkulutuksessa näkyy ero: Fiat Scudo kuluttaa 6.20 L ja on siten kevyt taloudellisempi kuin Renault Trafic Transporter, jonka kulutus on 6.60 L. Ero on noin 0.40 L /100 km.

Sähkönkulutuksessa etu on Renault Trafic Transporter:lla: se kuluttaa 21.20 kWh /100 km ja on jonkin verran energiatehokkaampi kuin Fiat Scudo, jonka kulutus on 23.60 kWh. Ero on noin 2.40 kWh.

Toimintamatkassa Fiat Scudo suoriutuu tuskin havaittava paremmin: se yltää jopa 352 km:een, noin 34 km enemmän kuin Renault Trafic Transporter.

Moottori ja suorituskyky

Teho, vääntömomentti ja kiihtyvyys kertovat paljon auton ajotuntumasta. Tässä näkyy, kumpi tarjoaa enemmän ajamisen iloa.

Moottoritehossa Fiat Scudo on tuskin havaittava etulyöntiasemassa – 180 hv verrattuna 170 hv:een. Ero on noin 10 hv hv.

Kiihdytyksessä 0–100 km/h Fiat Scudo on tuskin havaittava nopeampi – se saavuttaa 100 km/h ajassa 10.50 s, kun taas Renault Trafic Transporter tarvitsee 10.80 s. Ero on noin 0.30 s sekuntia.

Huippunopeudessa Renault Trafic Transporter on huomattava edellä – se yltää 180 km/h:een, kun taas Fiat Scudo saavuttaa 130 km/h. Ero on noin 50 km/h.

Myös vääntömomentissa näkyy ero: Fiat Scudo vetää melkein huomaamaton voimakkaammin, 400 Nm verrattuna 380 Nm:een. Eroa on noin 20 Nm.

Tila ja käytännöllisyys

Perheauto vai arjen kumppani – kumpi tarjoaa enemmän tilaa, mukavuutta ja käytettävyyttä?

Molemmissa autoissa on tilaa 6 henkilölle.

Omapainossa Fiat Scudo on melkein huomaamaton kevyempi – 1722 kg verrattuna 1848 kg:een. Painoero on noin 126 kg.

Maksimikantavuudessa Renault Trafic Transporter pärjää selvästi havaittava paremmin – jopa 8900 L, noin 2300 L enemmän kuin Fiat Scudo.

Kantavuudessa Fiat Scudo on ilmeinen parempi – 1805 kg verrattuna 1222 kg:een. Ero on noin 583 kg.

Kuka voittaa vertailun?

Fiat Scudo osoittautuu olevan voittaa niukasti ja saa siksi tittelin DriveDuel Champion!
Tässä vertailussa Fiat Scudo on monipuolisempi kokonaisuus.

alkaen noin 36 100 €

Fiat Scudo

  • Moottorityyppi : Sähkö, Diesel
  • Vaihteisto : Automaatti, Manuel
  • Vetotapa : Etuveto
  • Teho hv : 120 - 180 hv
  • Kulutus L/100km : 6.2 - 6.5 L
  • Kulutus kWh/100km : 23.6 - 24 kWh
  • Sähköinen toimintasäde : 221 - 352 km
Tiedot

Fiat Scudo

Scudo on monipuolinen ja käytännöllinen pakettiauto, joka sopii niin kaupunkiliikenteeseen kuin pidemmillekin matkoille. Sen tilavat sisätilat ja ergonominen muotoilu tekevät siitä erinomaisen valinnan ammattilaisille ja perheille. Lisäksi Scudo tarjoaa mukautettavia varusteita, jotka helpottavat arkea ja tekevät ajamisesta miellyttävää.

Tiedot

Renault Trafic Transporter

Trafic Transporter on joustava ja tilava vaihtoehto, joka soveltuu erinomaisesti sekä liiketoimintaan että vapaa-ajan käyttöön. Sen käytännöllinen muotoilu ja mukava ajo-ominaisuus tekevät siitä suositun valinnan kuljetusalan ammattilaisille. Uuden mallin parannettu varustelu tarjoaa entistä enemmän mukavuutta ja turvallisuutta kaikille matkustajille.

Tiedot

Samankaltaiset vertailut

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Fiat Scudo
Renault Trafic Transporter

Kustannukset ja kulutus
Hinta
36100 - 59900 €
Hinta
38700 - 61300 €
Kulutus L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
Kulutus L/100km
6.6 - 7.8 L
Kulutus kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh
Kulutus kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh
Sähköinen toimintasäde
221 - 352 km
Sähköinen toimintasäde
240 - 318 km
Akun kapasiteetti
-
Akun kapasiteetti
-
CO2
0 - 172 g/km
CO2
0 - 206 g/km
Polttoainesäiliön tilavuus
69 L
Polttoainesäiliön tilavuus
80 L

Mitat ja kori
Kori
Pakettiauto
Kori
Pakettiauto
Istuimet
2 - 6
Istuimet
3 - 6
Ovet
4
Ovet
4
Omamassa
1722 - 2260 kg
Omamassa
1848 - 2075 kg
Tavaratila
-
Tavaratila
-
Pituus
4980 - 5330 mm
Pituus
5080 - 5480 mm
Leveys
1920 mm
Leveys
1956 mm
Korkeus
1895 - 1935 mm
Korkeus
1967 - 2509 mm
Maksimi tavaratila
5300 - 6600 L
Maksimi tavaratila
3300 - 8900 L
Kantavuus
840 - 1805 kg
Kantavuus
848 - 1222 kg

Moottori ja suorituskyky
Moottorityyppi
Sähkö, Diesel
Moottorityyppi
Diesel, Sähkö
Vaihteisto
Automaatti, Manuel
Vaihteisto
Manuel, Automaatti
Vaihteiston tyyppi
Alennusvaihteisto, Manuaalivaihteisto, Automaattivaihteisto
Vaihteiston tyyppi
Manuaalivaihteisto, Alennusvaihteisto, Automaattivaihteisto
Vetotapa
Etuveto
Vetotapa
Etuveto
Teho hv
120 - 180 hv
Teho hv
110 - 170 hv
Kiihtyvyys 0-100 km/h
10.5 - 11.2 s
Kiihtyvyys 0-100 km/h
10.8 - 15.1 s
Huippunopeus
130 km/h
Huippunopeus
110 - 180 km/h
Vääntömomentti
260 - 400 Nm
Vääntömomentti
245 - 380 Nm
Sylinterien lukumäärä
4
Sylinterien lukumäärä
4
Teho kW
88 - 132 kW
Teho kW
81 - 125 kW
Iskutilavuus
1499 - 2184 cm3
Iskutilavuus
1997 cm3

Yleiset
Mallivuosi
2024 - 2025
Mallivuosi
2022 - 2025
CO2-tehokkuusluokka
A, F
CO2-tehokkuusluokka
F, G, A
Merkki
Fiat
Merkki
Renault

Samankaltaiset vertailut

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Millaisia voimalinjoja Fiat Scudo:ssa on saatavilla?

Mallia tarjotaan Etuveto-versiona.

Näytetyt hinnat ja tiedot ovat arvioita, jotka perustuvat Saksan listahintoihin, ja voivat vaihdella maittain. Nämä tiedot eivät ole oikeudellisesti sitovia.